(c) Het Parool - Saturday 9 September 1995, pag. 3


               

SCIENTOLOGY AT WAR ON INTERNET

There is a war between users of the Internet and the Scientology Church. This week, the battle reached the Netherlands, when the cult seized the computers of Amsterdam Internet Provider Xs4all. Today (saturday), Internet users are on an worldwide picket agaings the Church of Scientology. By Addie Schulte The Scientology movement does not like criticism and uses all means to silence their critics, according to Internet users. The raid at Xs4all is just the last of many examples of how the Scientology church tries to remove information they don't like from the net. In America, four former members of the cult were raided this year. Supposedly they distributed documents through the net, to which Scientology holds the copyright. Scientology is an extremely succesful yet at the same time extremely controversial movement, which was founded in the fifties by L. Ron Hubbard. Hubbard died in 1986, but the cult still florishes and claims to have eight million followers worldwide. In the Netherlands and in the United States, Scientology has the status of a church, which gives them tax benefits. Money is important in the church. The church, which is a closed society, offers psychotherapeutical courses to its followers which cost a a large amount of money. The battle with the Internet community is about texts which are used for some of these courses. They are for the so called OT (Operating Thetan) levels and became public during a trial in de United States. For a while anyone could order these texts from an American courthouse by paying the costs of copying. The texts were evidence in the case between former cult member Steven Fishman and the Church of Scientology. Fishmans story reads like a secondrate detective story. In 1988 he was was arrested on the suspicion of fraud which he commited while being a cult member. The cult ordered him to murder psychologist dr U. Geerts, because he told him the specifics of his crimes. Later the cult ordered him to commit suicide ('end of cycle' in the Scientology jargon) and in prison an attack on his life was made by a cult member. At his trial he entered the OT levels as evidence, to prove that Scientology had forced him to commit the fraud. This is the material which Scientology which Scientology had the most problems with. The church owns the copyrights to these texts and its followers have to pay enormous amounts of money, up to hundreds of thousands of dollars, to read them. Some weeks ago, their lawyers succeeded in changing the status of the documents. They are no longer publicly available. Meanwhile the texts were distributed through the Internet. Critics had placed them on a computer in China among others, to make it difficult to Scientology to have them removed via a lawsuit. Later on the documents were removed, because the data traffic to China was troubled. The documents were too much in demand. Scientologists were battling information about the Cult on Internet since the end of 1994. Their main target was the newsgroup, and electronic discussion panel, alt.religion.scientology. The lawyer of the movement in the US tried to have Internet providers remove this newsgroup, an action which was seen by Internet users at large as an attempt at censorship and a restriction of freedom of speech. With the aid of special computer programs even messages from others were removed from the newsgroup. In February of this year, Internet providers in the US and Finland were dealt with. In august various former cult members were next. Also, the Scientology church started a lawsuit against the Washington Post, which they lost. This week, Scientology targeted Amsterdam Internet Provider Xs4all. Tuesday morning, a bailiff, a locksmith, some policemen and two American members of the Scientology movement entered the offices of Xs4all. Their mission was to seize the computers of the Internet provider which connect thousands of people through the worldwide network. Based on the supposed infringement of copyrights, the Amsterdam court gave the Scientology movement permission for the seizure. Previously, the Scientology movement announced that they would attempt legal action against Xs4all. At first, the cults action was aimed at the presence of an 'anonymous remailer' at the computers of Xs4all. This is a program that anonimises email. Users of the Internet can send a message to such a remailer, which strips the sender from the message and sends it on. As a result, it is no longer possible to see who sent the message. Remailers are not forbidden and can be found on various places on the Internet. According to the Scientology movement, the anonymous remailer at Xs4all was used to send texts to which the church holds the copyright. According to Felipe Rodriguez of Xs4all the remailer was already out of commission for two months at the time of the raid. At the time of the raid, the Scientology movement produced another complaint. One of the users, known as 'fonss', had put the OT levels on his homepage, a personal page an Internet which users can make by themselves. Management of Xs4all refused to satisfy the demand to remove the information but informed the user about the complaint. He removed the text by himself and replaced it with a 'link", a pointer to a different location. "Of course, there was protest against the activities of the Scientology church on Internet, also by people who didn't bother about it previously." During the raid a letter disappeared which was directed at a friend of one of Xs4alls employee. An hour later, this friend was called by a member of the cult. The Internet provider is still conferring with lawyer mr. P. Bakker Schut about legal action against Scientology. "We are part of an international communication structure. We are not going to force our users", according to Felipe Rodriguez of Xs4all. Het is furious about the latest attempt at censorship of the computer network. "Is a cult going to decide how Internet works? Without knowing it, the Justice Department has allowed the Scientology movement to use it for their own private goals." The Justice Department has no comments. [Translated from Dutch by Mike Schenk, September 10, 1995]